General LDS Information
Basic LDS Beliefs
LDS Videos
Critics' Questions
Submitted Questions
Scriptures/LDS Literature
LDS Temples
Music and Arts
LDS Online Stores
Priesthood, Humor, Miscel.
Site Map

Suggest a Site
Now accepting banner ads!

STEPHEN - I heard a few brethern in EQP and HPG talk about Church members who are veil workers and are Masonic grand masters in various degrees throughout Utah and the world. My question is, can they be members of both?

JOEL - There are a number of active church members today who are also masons, but not many. There has never been a general statement by the Church specifically telling its members not to join the Masonic Fraternity. However, Church leaders caution that membership in fraternal organizations such as this should be avoided, because they may take time and energy available beyond your daily vocation and your hours of rest, that could be spent in furthering the interests of the church and priesthood and family duties.

Here's an interesting quote from president Harold B. Lee:

"Now, just one more thought with reference to giving priesthood to men who belong to secret and fraternal orders. I was in a mission where there was an able man whose services were needed, but someone had the understanding that he could not be given the priesthood and used because he was a Mason. It was thought that there were some letters of instruction from the First Presidency, or President Joseph Fielding Smith, that gave them license to withhold priesthood or any activities from this man. When I asked them to show me the letters they referred to, we found that what they said in substance was: If there is such a man (and quite frequently you will find some of these leading men who turn up as members of some lodge—Mason, Eagle, Elks Club, etc.) the thing that you should always say is, "I am not concerned about what you have been. I am concerned about what you are going to be from now on."
If he understands and is truly converted, he will agree that his first allegiance will be to his priesthood and to the Church, and that he will cease his fraternal activities. Some of them argue that they should maintain their membership because of the insurance values of belonging. Whether they do that or not is their own business, but if they tell us that they are prepared to give their first allegiance to the Church, then we can give them the priesthood and full activity as merited by their worthiness.
President Heber J. Grant used to tell us about one such man who had been an active member in a Masonic Lodge, and when President Grant told this man he was being called to be the president of a stake, the man demurred, saying, "I am a 32nd Degree Mason." President Grant said the same thing to him: "I am not concerned with what you have been. It is what you are going to be from now on."
You cannot serve two masters, and so we say to you, use these men, and probably by their being used, you will gradually wean them from what you don't like to something that is better." (Harold B. Lee, "Stand Ye in Holy Places", Chapter 27, 1974)

You can interpret that as you will, but it sounds like, although you may not lose your church membership over it, being both a Mason and an active temple working Mormon is probably not a desirable thing.

Return to top
Return to Questions