BEN - As I was talking with some
family about the Church, the topic of blacks and the
priesthood came up. It was said that, until President
Kimball kneeled in prayer concerning people of
all races being able to hold the priesthood, it had
never before been revealed that those of African
descent could not hold the priesthood, and that this
was the first time such a revelation had been made,
that the restriction on the priesthood was simply
assumed given scriptural reference and culture at the
time. I then realized that I hadn't, in fact,
read any canonized, official church statements
barring blacks from the priesthood. Is this true, or
is there something I've missed?
JOEL - As you probably know, there are verses in the Book of
Abraham, which may have been the basis for the priesthood ban.
In the first chapter of the Book of Abraham, Abraham
writes that Pharoah, the king of Egypt, was "a
righteous man", but could not hold the Priesthood
because he was a descendant of Ham, and the Hamitic
lineage or bloodline was "blessed with wisdom" but
"cursed as pertaining to the Priesthood" (See Abraham
1:26).
In another revelation in the Book of Moses, it says
that the Cainites, the descendants of Cain, the son of
Adam, were "black" (Moses 7:22).
From the early days of the church some members have interpreted these verses as
saying that blacks, being of the Cainite/Hamitic
bloodline, would not be allowed to hold the
Priesthood until the Abelites first had the
opportunity.
On January 6th, 1848, based on the Abraham scriptures,
Brigham Young declared:
"The Lord said I will not kill Cain, but I will put a
mark upon him and it is seen in the face of every
Negro on earth. And it is the degree of God that that
mark shall remain upon the seed of Cain and the Curse
until all the seed of Abel should be redeemed and Cain
will not hold the priesthood until all the seed of
Abel are redeemed. Any man having one drop of
the seed of Cain in him cannot hold the Priesthood and
if no other Prophet spake it before I will say it now
in the name of Jesus Christ." (Journal of Wilford
Woodruff 4:97)
Even though the ban started in earnest with Brigham
Young, Joseph Smith did once refer to Negroes as "the
sons of Cain" (History of the Church 4:501) and
statements of associates of Smith suggest the the
doctrine started with him posibly based on the
Abraham scriptures.
Later in Church history on August 17th, 1949, the
First Presidency issued its official "Statement by The
First Presidency of The Church on the Negro Question"
which said in part:
“The attitude of the Church with reference to Negroes
remains as it has always stood. It is not a matter of
policy but of direct commandment from the Lord, on
which is founded the doctrine of the Church from the
days of its organization, to the effect that Negroes
may become Members of the Church but that they are not
entitled to the Priesthood at the present time."
Another official statement from the Church presidency
in December 1969 titled "The First Presidency on the
Rights of the Negro" says the following:
"From the beginning of this dispensation, Joseph Smith
and all succeeding presidents of the Church have
taught that Negroes, while spirit children of a common
Father, and the progeny of our earthly parents Adam
and Eve, were not yet to receive the priesthood, for
reasons which we believe are known to God, but which
He has not made fully known to man.
Our living prophet, President David O. McKay, has
said, "The seeming discrimination by the Church toward
the Negro is not something which originated with man;
but goes back into the beginning with God....
"Revelation assures us that this plan antedates man's
mortal existence, extending back to man's pre-existent
state." President McKay has also said, "Sometime in
God's eternal plan, the Negro will be given the right
to hold the priesthood."
Until God reveals His will in this matter, to him whom
we sustain as a prophet, we are bound by that same
will. Priesthood, when it is conferred on any man
comes as a blessing from God, not of men."
Even though the origin of this doctrine is a little
hazy and there were no "official" written revelations
or scriptures pronouncing the ban, sources indicate
that this doctrine was not just "assumed" from the
scriptures, nor was it just opinion; it was declared
in addresses by early church leaders, based on their
God inspired interpretation of the Abraham
scriptures mentioned, and it was supported as official Church doctrine by later prophets of
the church.
For these reasons, this doctrine would not be considered just an unsupported
man-made policy or "mistake" that needs to be admitted to.
"To every thing there is a season, and a time to every
purpose under the heaven:" (Eccl. 3: 1) For a purpose
known to God there was a season of time
that the Blacks were to not have the priesthood;
just as there was a season of time that the gospel
was not to be preached to the Gentile nations or Samaritans(Matthew 10:5-6).
Updated statement from the Church on Race and the Priesthood (2013)